Here’s a hypothesis to be tested: Title IX is helping women’s sports. Sort of.
It may be that all the Title IX time, energy and money going into women’s sports is not helping women except for giving most of them a chance to say “You go, girl!”
It looks much like it benefits the minority who are good at sports and competition. That is to say, it mostly serves masculinized women. It’s not just bone structure, pelvic dimensions and the 2D:4D ratio, marking these women as atypical. It’s also behavioral differences; they may have more typically masculine traits of competitiveness. Very useful in sports.
This is just a hypothesis so far. But a rough check would be to find out who the top female athletes choose for intimate partners: Are they disproportionately sleeping with other women?
If the hypothesis checks out it would show that the Title IX resources are being hijacked by a minority.
The majority of women don’t benefit.
Except as cheerleaders.
How sexist is that?
How fair is that?
Adam likes the company of small domestic animals and 82% of women. Enjoys long walks in the rain (in the Pacific Northwest, he'd better).
robot, fembot, womandroid, prostitute, robohooker, whorehouse. women's studies, domestic violence, procuring, pimping